Overall the Samsung SM1625 drives are performing well in our RAID 0 benchmarks. In a dual ported configuration, it is likely we would get another 50-60% performance. Samsung SM1625 200GB RAID 0 ATTO BenchmarkĪTTO is the king of sequential performance and we see between 1GB/s and 1.1GB/s in sequential reads/ writes using the RAID 0 drives. ATTO is known to write highly compressible data to drives, which inflates speeds of controllers that compress data like LSI/ SandForce does prior to writing on a given solid state drive. The value of the ATTO benchmark is really to show the best-case scenario. Compared to the other similarly priced drives we have benchmarked recently, these are solid results. Like with AS SSD we see some very solid figures coming from these drives. Samsung SM1625 200GB RAID 0 CrystalDiskMark Benchmark This is in contrast to the ATTO Benchmark used by LSI/ Sandforce and its partners when they market a given solid state drive. CrystalDiskMarkĬrystalDiskMark is another benchmark which gives non-compressible read/write numbers. The real standout is the high-thread count 4K read speeds reaching over 650MB/s. The sequential and 4K-64Thrd speeds are about twice what we saw with the single drive configurations. In AS SSD we can see fairly solid results. Samsung SM1625 200GB RAID 0 AS SSD Benchmark The result is perhaps one of the best workstation SSD benchmarks available today. AS SSD BenchmarkĪS SSD is a solid benchmark that does not write compressible data to drives. The results should be fairly straightforward and the index of previous articles in this series (linked above) is a good resource to compare against. Samsung SM1625 200GB SSD Quick Benchmarksįor our quick tests during this part of the series we will just provide the quick benchmarks with only a bit of commentary. It also is a reason NVMe is going to be a game changer in the enterprise storage space. There is a latency penalty for going over the PCIe bus to a controller to SAS. We are using a SAS controller so one cannot compare results directly to consumer-driven setups where a SATA SSD is connected to an Intel PCH port. SAS Controller: (onboard LSI SAS2008 in IR mode) and LSI SAS 3008.Processors: Dual Intel Xeon E5-2690 (V2).Since we are going to assume the use of already released hardware, we are using a legacy system for testing across the test suite: We are also working on being able to add NVMe based SSDs to this as a comparison to state-of-the-art NAND storage. Our goal is to continue posting one more per week in-between other articles. 2x SanDisk Lightning 406s 400GB SAS SSD benchmarks.2x Smart Storage System/ SanDisk Optimus 400GB MLC SAS SSD benchmarks.2x Seagate Pulsar.2 200GB SAS SSD benchmarks.2x SanDisk Lightning 206s 200GB SAS SSD benchmarks.Samsung SM1625 200GB SAS SSD benchmarks.Smart Storage System/ SanDisk Optimus 400GB MLC SAS SSD benchmarks.Pliant/ SanDisk Lightning 406s 400GB SLC SAS SSD benchmarks.Seagate Pulsar.2 200GB MLC SAS SSD benchmarks.Pliant/ SanDisk Lightning 206s 200GB SLC SAS SSD benchmarks.We are continually growing this data set but here are the benchmark runs thus far: Single SAS SSD Benchmarks As a result, these are our quick benchmark results for two Samsung SM1625 200GB SAS SSDs in RAID 0. We are also looking at the performance of each of the drives in RAID 0. We have been looking at the Samsung SM1625 in single port mode, however the figures for dual port mode are supposed to be higher. These follow four other SAS SSDs as part of our continued series on SAS SSDs we purchased between $0.50 and $0.60/ GB. We recently published our quick benchmarks for a single Samsung SM1625 200GB SAS SSD.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |